ExxonMobil ramps up preparations for possible 2018 operations
The four-company group chasing the FPSO order, said sources, comprise Bluewater, BW Offshore, Modec, Saipem and SBM Offshore.
The news would spell good ones for Guyana after ExxonMobil announced the find back in May. It was the first major oil find for Guyana which has been heavily dependent on imported oil to meet energy and transportation needs.
However, neighbouring Venezuela has since revived its claims to Guyana’s territory, including the waters where ExxonMobil found the oil.
According to Upstreamonline.com, reporting on ExxonMobil’s plans, yesterday said that this early production system could be the forerunner of a full-field project, tentatively based on a larger FPSO with capacity in the range of 150,000 to 200,000 barrels per day (bpd).
However, industry sources cautioned that the US Company has not yet taken definite decisions on its preferred strategy for Liza, and that how it will move to full field development is not yet clear.
Nevertheless, ExxonMobil, is said to be enthused by the potential of Liza, a play-opening frontier wildcat which was completed in May.
“It’s a huge field,” said one source, adding that ExxonMobil thinks that this area “could be a second Angola.”
ExxonMobil contracted seismic player CGG to acquire what industry sources said was as much as 20,000 square kilometres of seismic data earlier this year, using two vessels and fast-tracked processing.
Despite the dearth of floater projects globally, the FPSO companies’ studies are said to have been partly funded by the ExxonMobil. These preliminary studies focused on an early production system but also, said one source, took in conceptual work on the potential full-field scheme.
Pre-FEED work began early this summer, with documents submitted in mid-September.
ExxonMobil is expected to decide on its preferred bidders within weeks.
One source suggested two or three players may be asked to take part in a competitive contest lasting six to nine months, leading to a potential contract award in the third quarter of next year.
ExxonMobil is also in talks with subsea players about hardware provision. Liza’s initial subsea production system is expected to include gas injectors and perhaps water injectors, as well as production wells.
There is market talk that the subsea system supporting the early production FPSO could more than triple in size if ExxonMobil is confident about the reservoir parameters.
One source, Upstreamonline.com said, noted that the broader challenge for the development lies less with its technical aspects and more with the area’s isolation.
There is no maritime or oil and gas infrastructure. The topography of the region would make development of such facilities very difficult.
Instead, supplies would likely come from Trinidad & Tobago where ExxonMobil sourced its drilling operation, though sources warned that the distance and strong ocean currents make logistics challenging.
Upstream previously reported that ExxonMobil intends to drill at least four more wells on its 6.6-million acre Stabroek block.
These will appraise Liza — an Upper Cretaceous discovery — and also target an exploration prospect called Ranger, a different play concept from the initial hit.
Sources familiar with the geology of the trend said they believed the reservoir would produce light oil with low viscosity that could flow at rates of anywhere from 15,000 to 20,000 barrels per day from a single well.
ExxonMobil put out a tender earlier this year to secure a rig for the drilling programme that was thought to have drawn bids from a host of major rig contractors, but Upstream understands the rig procurement process is ongoing.
An ExxonMobil representative said the company “continues to progress” its future plans for the block, but offered few details.
“Liza-1 well and seismic data are being analysed to evaluate the resource potential of the reservoir and additional potential on the block,” said the representative. “Further details of our 2016 drilling program are in development.”
The original Liza wildcat hit more than 295 feet of high-quality oil bearing sandstone reservoirs and was drilled to 17,825 feet by the Transocean drillship Deepwater Champion. The site lies about 120 miles (192 kilometres) off Guyana in 5719 feet of water.
ExxonMobil operates Stabroek on a 45% stake, with US independent Hess holding 30% and China National Offshore Oil Corporation-owned Nexen on 25%.


Comments
Early days but remain a sceptic.
100% foreign owned.
Shouldn’t the Guyana government be involved on a 50 50 partnership.
Or minimum 50% tax on every barrel of oil recovered.
Would love to see (study) the agreement licence issued for exploration by the previous government……
Exxon 45%
Hess 30%
China 25%
Guyana ?
Sorry not good enough.
Explanation by minister necessary.
Manganese’s
Will you loan Guyana the money to pay for the 50% exploration cost?……and suppose the oil is not really in commercial quantities
One of the real benefits is Venezuela will shut up, for I doubt they would dare disturb those people doing their work within the borders of Guyana.
Border Security has a cost and is worth the consideration ….
Exxon 45%
Hess 30%
China 25%.
So when the oil starts to flow in 2018 what is Guyana s share ?
If Exxon does not wish to “compromise” over the issue there
are many others who would love to. Yes even MADuro or Putin or
Norway…..Guyana must not allow any consortium the upper hand in negotiating its natural resources so easily….it must be part of the process not bystanders/onlookers….,expecting to share in the spoils its resources by multinationals.
This will become more a “political” than an economic issue later….better resolved
before its too late.
Exxon is American.
Hess is multinational corporation American based.
Not sure about nexen but may be multinational Chinese corporation.
Some research is necessary before moving forward !
Am interested in what the minister has to say !
Maybe a press release is in the “pipeline” or public announcement.
Early days.
Kamtan
PS when Thatcher came to power the north sea was in full flow….
She used the oil wealth to pay off the USA war debts.
Now north sea oil is in decline we will be returning to coal and nuclear
as energy source…..dirty dangerous energy source.
History has a funny way of repeating itself.
Thatcher closed most of the coal mines in ukplc after clash with Scargill miners leaders in a “power struggle” ….it was cheaper to purchase coal from Poland.
The money made from dirty fuel should be reinvested in cleaner meaner renewable energy.
Obama’s tracking will return to haunt him.
Pumping toxic chemicals into mountains to extract oil is costly and dangerous.
An am no environmental freak or scientist.
Clean potable water is more valuable than oil….at $45 barrel.
Guyana “land of many waters” ! 😈
Exxon 45%
Hess 30%
China 25%.
So when the oil starts to flow in 2018 what is Guyana s share
Guyana’s share is the tax levied per barrel. Guyana cannot afford the millions in exploraton and refinery costs thru ownership. Guyana own Guysuco. Look what it get now.
A $1/barrel tax means US $150-200,000/day. Try to be too greedy and you may get nothing.
It’s not greed my friend….its principle. Corporations and their bosses are the greedy ones…..profits at all cost !
Then use their “skills” to avoid Guyana/national taxes.
Corruption !
They will also buy out any politician to achieve their objective.
Greedy trough suckers.
Kamtan
I totally agree with you Kamtan.
And for the benefit of those who have not seen my initial post on this matter a few months ago I am re-posting it here.
I said this before and I will say it again.
The GREAT WHITE SHARKS have finally invaded Guyana’s waters.
These white sharks are not here to help the Guyanese People; they are here to
exploit our natural resources while at the same time pollute our shoreline and
coastal waters. They have not made a new discovery that we did not already know exist.
The Venezuelan authorities invented a false claim on our territory as a delaying tactic so that they could extract as much oil as possible near our borders.
(Thou shalt not COVET)
Remember what the expatriates did to our other natural resources,
Bauxite, Manganese, Gold, Diamond, Forest and agricultural products etc. How much did Guyana benefit from their presence and exploitation here? Have we forgotten how they enslaved our forefathers? Have we forgotten that while these great white sharks were having huge feasts at their lavishly laid tables our forefathers and off-springs were fed crumbs and stale meat and discoloured salted fish?
Have we forgotten that they were the ones who pitted the two major races against each other – divide and conquer strategy?
Have we forgotten our history? What did they do to our fore fathers, our
dollar and the exchange rate is so shameful, are we willing to forget these?
Mr. President, before you ever sign any agreement with these
expatriate crooks at Exxon Mobile please take the time to delve into the
history of this and other oil companies. Make sure that such agreement receives public scrutiny. We Guyanese are not dumb asses as they made us out to be. We have come a long way in the field of education.
In the USA they rake in Billions of dollars in profits while
at the same time use loopholes to garnish billions more in Government
subsidies, taxpayers money, besides manipulating prices at the pump to maximize their profits.
To add insult to the intelligence of the populace they damage and destroy the roads and other infrastructure with their heavy vehicles and have the nerve to expect the taxpayers (through additional fuel taxes) to foot the bill for the repairs while their profits explode to the highest degree. Yes, these fat cats in the oil industry are rolling in wealth at the taxpayers expense.
Besides, they do not care about the environment. Exploding trains, fuel tankers, broken pipelines, leaking rigs and sea going fuel tankers, and environmental pollution mean nothing to them. Poisoning waterways with their toxic waste, polluting the air with toxic emissions from the chimneys of their refineries, are of little concern to them (all oil companies) Destroying fertile agricultural lands with synthetic fertilizers (by-products of the oil industry) inclusive. All that they are concerned about is the huge profits they can generate while the poor working class have to figure out where their next meal is coming from. Are these the the people we are enticed to do business with? I think not and there are millions out there who share the same concerns too.
If someone comes up with an invention that can generate much
cheaper electricity without the use of fossil fuel, or if someone invents an
engine that can run on water instead: their inventions are not allowed to see
the light. Besides, they are either murdered or their inventions are destroyed or confiscated or their lobbyists ensure that no progress is made in any invention that will benefit the masses at the demise of oil. There are tons of evidence on these matters now available, thanks to the age of modern technology.
IS THIS WHAT WE WANT FOR OUR COUNTRY AND OUR PEOPLE? Are we so dumb as to forget what our forefathers went through in the hands of these expatriates before we gained our independence and kicked them
out? Are we going to allow history to repeat itself?
Mr. President, you are the new MOSES of our people. You and
your cabinet are tasked with the responsibility of uniting our people, to break
the yoke of Babylon hanging around our necks, find a way to extricate our
people from the claws of the IMF, the World Bank and all those institutions
that sink their teeth into our Nation’s Natural resources and our peoples life
blood. This is slavery in disguise.
The united States Government is one of the most corrupt in the world. Oil Money talks. Politicians are bought out left right and center. Beware Mr. President, of the wolves in sheep’s clothing. Beware that you and your cabinet are not victims to these greedy corporations. Examine every clause of any contract presented to your Government and look for the embedded “CLAWS”.
Look out also for traitors in your entourage – the sly Judases. Ensure that we get a fair deal – people oriented. Poverty is not our inheritance. Our wealth was stolen from us. This wrong must be put right.
Beware of their “SWEET TALK” and get the people’s input in this bold step forward for the benefit of our people. Our environment, our integrity, our sovereignty, our natural resources, MUST be protected at all cost.
Failure to do so will result in severe economical consequences for our people,our future, our country.
Well Kamtan, you have a strong vote in your corner. This sounds like a call for nationalisation.
Albert….no need to nationalise…..just regulate and tax it….but taxes should be used
to subsidise alternative sustainable energy sources….solar wind and wave….
It’s not rocket science just commonsense approach to Guyana s future energy
needs. Sun wind and wave technology is the future as its free…..and is becoming
more affordable. My installation in Spain cost £1500 a decade ago and should last
two more decades….that’s £50 per year for all my energy needs.
Oil not unlike coal is cheap and a dirty energy source….in my area in Spain
mountainous there are already “solar farms” to generate electricity fed into
national grid.
Nationalisation is “history” ….regulate and tax…avoids corruption by multinational corporations.
UK s corporate tax is 20% ireland12% most of EU 22%…..taxation WMDW.