ExxonMobil strikes more oil offshore Guyana – value could be US$6.2 billion

ExxonMobil strikes more oil offshore Guyana

Stena Carron oil drill ship

Stena Carron oil drill ship

US oil giant ExxonMobil made its third significant discovery in its drilling explorations offshore Guyana.
ExxonMobil’s partner, Hess Corporation made this announcement in its third-quarter earnings on Wednesday, noting that the Liza 3 exploratory well’s net present value could be US$6.2 billion based on calculations from the Bank of Montreal (BMO) Capital Markets.

Liza 3, the fourth well spud by the super major, is in the Stabroek block, about 193 kilometres offshore Guyana.   

In late June, Exxon’s drilling results at Liza 2 revealed more than 58 metres of oil-bearing sandstone reservoirs in Upper Cretaceous formations. The well was drilled to 5475 metres at 1692 metres water depth. Drilling results confirmed recoverable resources to be between 800 million and 1.4 billion barrels of oil equivalent. Data from the Liza 2 well test is being assessed.

In May 2015, Exxon confirmed its significant oil discovery at its Liza 1 exploration well, where more than 295 feet of high-quality oil-bearing sandstone reservoirs was encountered.
The Liza wells are being drilled with the Stena Carron harsh environment drillship.
On September 8, ExxonMobil announced that its third exploratory well, Skipjack (the third well drilled and not Liza 3 as reported in the local media) was unsuccessful since it did not yield commercial quantities of hydrocarbons.
ExxonMobil spud Liza 3 after Skipjack turned up unfavourable. Skipjack was a separate prospect 25 miles northwest of the Liza wells.
The Liza 3 well, like Liza 2, will be focused on testing the flank of the Liza structure to determine the aerial extent of the reservoir.
In July 2016, ExxonMobil submitted a development plan for Liza to Guyana’s Environmental Protection Agency to begin the environmental review process.
That plan calls for a pair of rigs to drill development wells from two drill centres, each with a corresponding water injection site to the east.
Business site Bloomberg in June this year reported that ExxonMobil’s oil discovery off the coast of Guyana may hold as much as 1.4 billion barrels, twice the size of the previous estimate, making it potentially worth about US$70 billion based on current prices.
Bloomberg observed that this announcement comes as the oil industry emerges from the worst market slump in decades. Since dipping to a 12-year low in January, Brent crude oil, the international benchmark for crude oil, has risen nearly 80 per cent to about US$50 a barrel.
However, the discovery may not add to global oil supplies for years as deepwater finds can take half a decade or more to bring into production.
ExxonMobil Country Manager Jeff Simmons had announced that the US super major was likely to start production in 2020 with up to 100,000 barrels per day.
He noted though that the estimated 100,000 barrels per day would not remain constant for the proposed 20-year period that the company would be drilling, since there would be continuous drilling and actual production of oil, causing the output to fluctuate.
According to a BMO report on Oil and Gas 360, ExxonMobil plans to use two drillships to simultaneously drill development wells beginning in 2019.
Exxon holds a 45 per cent interest in the project, with Hess holding 30 per cent, and the remaining 25 per cent belonging to China State-owned offshore oil producer CNOOC.
ExxonMobil is expected to make an announcement on this new find sometime this week.

Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Comments

  • Rosaliene Bacchus  On October 29, 2016 at 1:55 pm

    Thanks for the update.

  • Born Guyanese  On October 29, 2016 at 4:34 pm

    So Exxon gets 45%, Hess 30%, and CNOOC 25%. How much does that leave for Guyana?

    • guyaneseonline  On October 30, 2016 at 2:42 am

      To Born Guyanese:

      Those numbers relate to the ownership of the investment.
      Guyana gets income from every barrel of oil that will be extracted.Guyanese will benefit from it… in infrastructure improvements and social services.

  • Nfvision  On December 9, 2016 at 7:29 am

    Hi if you know recruiter for exxon for this project, please share with me. Thanks nfvisiontech@gmail.com

  • Clyde Duncan  On December 9, 2016 at 8:10 pm

    The Memo OPEC Never Got

    It used to take ten years for market forces to catch up with OPEC production cuts. Now it takes a couple of weeks.

    By Francisco Toro – Caracas Chronicles
    December 1, 2016

    OPEC’s deal to cut 1.2 million barrels a day has seen a significant rally in oil prices, with WTI topping $51 a barrel and nearing its yearly high.

    So is this a blip or a game-changer in the oil market? Can this kind of rally be sustained?

    Let’s look at it this way. Back in the 1960s, geologists knew there was a whole lot of oil under the North Sea, between Scotland and Norway. It was no secret, but nobody developed it because prices were low: it would just cost too much to get at that oil.

    So there it sat until the 1973 Oil Embargo sent prices skyrocketing and suddenly those North Sea cost-benefit spreadsheets started to look pretty good.

    Of course, getting oil out of the North Sea was an engineering feat. Massive high tech new ocean rigs had to be designed, built and operated, huge new infrastructure had to be put in place. It took years.

    But in the 1980s, when North Sea oil started to hit the market in significant quantities, it began to bring down the price of oil, setting off the long slump that brought us, first, the Caracazo and later, the election of Hugo Chávez.

    One thing to notice about the story is the lags. They were long. It took 10 years from the 1973 oil embargo until North Sea oil became a major factor in the market. But then a funny thing happened, once prices came down, North Sea oil producers didn’t leave the market.

    Why? Because North Sea oil investment was “lumpy.” (That’s a technical term, btw.) It called for big up-front capital investment, but once that first “lump” was in place, running costs weren’t that high. In the economists’ lingo, it had high average costs but low marginal costs…and production decisions track marginal costs.

    Fast forward to today’s slump, set off by the new availability of Shale Oil. Just like scientists had known about North Sea oil long before it was economically feasible to produce it, the fact that the rocks under Texas and North Dakota had tons of oil locked up in them has been known to geologists for a long time. There was just no economically feasible way to get it out.

    Once again, the oil boom that started in 2003 changed that equation. New technologies came on-stream, and with oil in triple-digit territory, it was easy to fund the needed investments.

    So far, so 1970s-like. But there’s a difference. Shale oil investment is much less lumpy than North Sea oil investment. You don’t need to spend that much up front, but sustaining production isn’t as cheap. Average costs are relatively lower, and marginal costs are relatively higher. And shale oil production is easier to turn on and off in response to prices. You just stop pumping water into the shale and it stops spewing out oil. Then when conditions are right, you can pick up where you left off.

    The economics of shale just aren’t like the economics of the North Sea. Shale production is much more sensitive to market conditions than North Sea production. When you’re fracking, your marginal cost might be $40/barrel. If oil is at $39.99, you stop the rigs. If it climbs up to $40.01, you fire them back up.

    Shale is market-responsive in a way non-OPEC producers just weren’t in the past.

    And that is the memo that OPEC did NOT get.

    The adaptability of shale to prices makes a mockery of OPEC’s attempts to control market supply. It’s as though OPEC thinks it’s still the 70s and producers are going to take 10 years to bring in new supply to take advantage of higher prices again. That was yesterday’s world.

    In today’s world, this week’s oil price leads to production hikes not ten years from now, but next week. Probably some Texas and North Dakota marginal producers who had been sitting out the slump last week are already coming back into the market. In fact, the price slump of the last couple of years has become a driver of competitive pressure, with Shale Producers innovating feverishly to drive down costs:

    In shale fields from Texas to North Dakota, production costs have roughly halved since 2014, when Saudi Arabia signaled an output free-for-all in an attempt to drive higher-cost shale producers out of the market.

    Rather than killing the U.S. shale industry, the ensuing two-year price war made shale a stronger rival, even in the current low-price environment.

    In Dunn County, North Dakota, there are around 2,000 square miles where the cost to produce Bakken shale is $15 a barrel and falling, according to Lynn Helms, head of the state’s Department of Mineral Resources.

    “The success in Dunn County has been fantastic,” said Ron Ness, president of the North Dakota Petroleum Council.

    Dunn County’s cost is about the same as Iran’s, and a little higher than Iraq’s. Dunn County produces about 200,000 barrels of oil a day, about a fifth of daily production in the state.

    It is North Dakota’s sweet spot because it boasts the lowest costs in the state, yet improved technology and drilling techniques have boosted efficiency for the whole state and the entire U.S. oil industry.

    The breakeven cost per barrel, on average, to produce Bakken shale at the wellhead has fallen to $29.44 in 2016 from $59.03 in 2014, according to consultancy Rystad Energy. It added that in terms of wellhead prices, Bakken is the most competitive of major U.S. shale plays.

    The illusion that OPEC can control supply stably enough to have a lasting effect on prices is a throwback to an earlier era. We’re just so used to a world where that is the case we find it odd to realize that world has passed.

    In the world of Shale all OPEC can really do is voluntarily surrender market share in return for momentary little price spurts like the ones we’ve seen yesterday and today.

    The world changed – OPEC never got the memo!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: