Donald Trump’s Failing Presidency – By Robert Parry

Donald Trump’s Failing Presidency

April 25, 2017  – Consortiumnews.com

President Donald Trump

Special Report: After his election, Donald Trump had a narrow path to a transformational presidency, but it required breaking the neocon grip on U.S.A. foreign policy and telling truth to U.S. citizens. Already, Trump has failed, says Robert Parry.

By Robert Parry

The 100-day mark may be an artificial measuring stick for a U.S. president. Obviously much can happen in the remaining 1,361 days of a four-year term. But Donald Trump’s decisions in his first three months in office have put him on an almost irreversible path to failure.     

He now appears to be little more than a traditional Republican with more than a little dash of Kardashian sleaze in him, a boorish reality-TV star reading from a neocon script that could have been written for many of his GOP rivals, except he delivers his lines with worse grammar and a limited vocabulary, favouring imprecise words such as “beautiful” and “sad.”

Trump also has the look of a conman. He sold himself as a populist who would fight for the forgotten Americans, but is following domestic policies aimed at comforting his super-rich friends while afflicting his most loyal blue-collar supporters.

He promises a tax package that will give huge breaks to the already well-to-do; he backed a Republican health-care plan that would have left 24 million Americans without insurance but saved billions for billionaires; he shows no sign of delivering on his trillion-dollar infrastructure plan although he keeps pushing his “beautiful” wall across the entire border with Mexico; and his hectoring of U.S. companies to stop exporting jobs has been more show than substance.

On the foreign policy front, Trump has broken his vow to move away from endless war and needless confrontation – and avoid their extraordinary costs in blood and treasure. After months of getting newspaper-slapped by the mainstream media over Russia-gate, Trump has put his tail between his legs and become a housebroken dog to neocon dogma. He also licks the hand of Israel and Saudi Arabia as he and his team keep repeating the favorite Israeli-Saudi mantra that “Iran is the principal sponsor of terrorism.”

His administration also blames Iran – NOT Israel, Saudi Arabia and indeed the United States of America – for Middle Eastern instability. But it was President George W. Bush and his neocon advisers who devised the disastrous invasion of Iraq with Israeli backing; it was President Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton who pushed for “regime change” in Libya and Syria, another Israeli-Saudi priority; it was Saudi Arabia and its Gulf State allies that have armed Al Qaeda, Islamic State and other Sunni terrorist groups; it is Israel that has persecuted the indigenous Palestinian population for generations and invaded Lebanon among other neighbours.

For all its faults, Iran has mostly opposed these operations and is now contributing military forces to fight Islamic State and Al Qaeda militants in Iraq and Syria. Yet, Trump has now conformed to the upside-down view of the Middle East that all the “important people” of Official Washington know to be true, that it’s all Iran’s fault, except – of course – what can be pinned on Russia.

Trump as Sociopath

Under intense pressure from the Democratic and Republican establishments – and facing an intelligence-community-driven hysteria over vague links between some of his advisers and Moscow – Trump has further buckled on his pledge to improve relations with Russia, instead ratcheting up rhetoric and threats.

Trump earned Official Washington’s pat on the head for firing 59 Tomahawk missiles at Syria on April 6 before any careful evaluation of a chemical-weapons incident in northern Syria could be conducted, an action that Hillary Clinton and the neocon-dominated commentator class of Official Washington just loved.

Trump regaled Fox Business Network’s Maria Bartiromo with the tale of how he disclosed the missile strike to Chinese President Xi Jinping during a state visit to Trump’s estate at Mar-a-Lago, giving the impression that he might be similarly reckless in attacking North Korea. Trump said he delivered the news over “the most beautiful piece of chocolate cake that you’ve ever seen,” allowing him to gauge the shock on Xi’s face.

“I said, ‘Mr. President, let me explain something to you’ — this was during dessert — ‘we’ve just fired 59 missiles’ — all of which hit, by the way, unbelievable, from, you know, hundreds of miles away, all of which hit, amazing,” Trump said.

“And he [Xi] was eating his cake. And he was silent,” Trump continued, adding that the Chinese president paused for 10 seconds before asking his interpreter to repeat what Trump had said. Trump clearly was relishing the moment, although it appears that a number of the Tomahawk missiles missed the targeted Syrian airbase with some striking a nearby village, killing nine civilians including four children, Syrian media reported.

Though Trump insisted that Xi approved of the attack, Trump’s sociopathic behaviour most likely confirmed to Xi that Trump really is as mindlessly dangerous as many critics have warned.

Trump seems to enjoy watching shocked looks on people’s faces. I’m told that he explained to an associate that one of his joys in grabbing women by “the pussy” is to see their stunned reaction, fitting with his boast to Billy Bush of “Access Hollywood” that women are powerless to object given his status as a star. “When you’re a star, … you can do anything,” Trump said. “Grab ’em by the pussy. You can do anything.”

Trump is more respectful — and obedient — toward men with real money. His head was surely turned when Sheldon Adelson, one of Israel’s most devoted advocates who has publicly suggested dropping a nuclear bomb inside Iran to coerce its government to do what Israel wants, donated a record $5 million to Trump’s inaugural festivities.

Indeed, what we have learned about Trump in the first 100 days is that he is a thin-skinned, insecure narcissist who obsesses over slights and relishes tangible signs of praise and approval. The Clinton campaign was right about one thing at least, that Trump’s fragile ego puts the future of mankind at risk given his control of the U.S.A. nuclear arsenal.

Further enhancing that danger is that Trump apparently thinks his erratic behaviour is a plus, not realizing that there are limits to what a madman can get away with even if he has his twitchy finger on the nuclear button. At some point, one of Trump’s crazed bluffs will be called and then he will have little choice but to prove that he is, indeed, a madman.

Lost Hope

Not that these criticisms come as much surprise, but there was hope – after his surprise election – that this irascible and arrogant figure might at least have the backbone to stand up to Official Washington’s neoconservative foreign policy orthodoxies and challenge the Israeli-Saudi dominance of U.S.A. policies in the Middle East.

The thinking went that Trump was a self-centered sonuvabitch and that personality might help him resist the pressures from the Washington establishment and thus avert a new, dangerous and expensive Cold War with Russia. Cooperation with Russia also held out prospects for finally ending the endless wars of his immediate predecessors.

Some Trump supporters told me that perhaps someone like Trump was the only hope to shatter the orthodoxies that had come to encase Official Washington’s thinking in concrete. These hopeful supporters saw him as an uncouth buffoon, yes, but maybe someone who wouldn’t care what was said about him on CNN or in The New York Times or at a Brookings Institution conference, someone who was unorthodox enough to sledgehammer cracks in the official group thinks, allowing some necessary light of fresh thinking to finally pour through.

But even if that were the case – if Trump were that person – he faced very difficult obstacles, including the reality that neocon groupthink had solidified deeply into the foundation of the U.S. establishment, expanding from its initial base in the Republican Party to effective control of the national Democrats as well, although Democrats prefer different labels such as liberal or humanitarian interventionist to neoconservative (more a semantic difference than substantial).

For Trump, Official Washington’s foreign-policy consensus meant there were few credentialed individuals who could help him break the mold – and win Senate confirmation. Trump would have to look for people outside the traditional establishment and such people would find themselves under an aggressive review process looking for any misstep to disqualify them. And the few who might survive that ordeal would find themselves in largely hostile bureaucracies – at the State Department, the Pentagon, the intelligence agencies, or the National Security Council – that would be determined to either bring the outsider to heel or destroy him or her with leaks and obstructions.

The ‘Deep State’

Despite denials from mainstream commentators about America having a “deep state,” one does exist in Washington, as should be obvious watching the cable news shows or reading the major newspapers. Indeed, there is arguably less diversity allowed in the vaunted “free press” of America than in some supposedly authoritarian states.

For instance, even people with solid professional credentials who disagree with the U.S. government’s interpretation of the evidence on the April 4 chemical incident in Syria are excluded from participation in the public debate. The major U.S.A. media even takes pride in that exclusion because these people are deemed “fringe” or responsible for “propaganda” or guilty of “fake news.” The tendency toward careerist “groupthink” is very powerful in Washington and the national media.

So, Trump faced daunting challenges when he entered the presidency, requiring him to move quickly and decisively if he hoped to change the direction of the neocon endless-war bandwagon. He needed to put the establishment forces on the defensive by telling the truth about events where the Obama administration had kept the American people in the dark, such as the Syria-sarin case on Aug. 21, 2013, which was pinned on the Syrian government though evidence pointed toward anti-government rebels, and the Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 shoot-down over eastern Ukraine on July 17, 2014, which was blamed on Russia while key U.S.A. intelligence evidence was kept hidden.

Trump also needed to show that he would not be the patsy of either Israel or the Saudi royal family. That would have required telling some unpleasant truths, such as the well-known fact inside the U.S. intelligence community that Saudi Arabia and its Gulf State allies have been state sponsors of terrorism for decades, making the fanatical killers from Al Qaeda and Islamic State possible, and that Israel has bent U.S. foreign policy in the region for generations.

If Trump really had the guts that he likes people to think he has, he could have frozen or seized Saudi assets as punishment for the kingdom’s state sponsorship of terrorism and for using Sunni extremists as a paramilitary force in its sectarian rivalry with Shiite-ruled countries like Iran. Or if he wanted to demonstrate his defiance of the hyped-up Russia-gate allegations, he could have immediately announced a summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin on how to bring the “war on terror” to a conclusion, rather than play a timid defense.

At the outset of his presidency, Trump could have really shaken things up. But instead he wasted his first days proving that he was the pumped-up fool that his detractors said he was. Rather than show some grace toward the defeated Democrats, he insisted absurdly that his inaugural crowd was bigger than President Obama’s (which it wasn’t). He failed to appreciate or defuse the anger from the Women’s March, which filled the streets of dozens of cities the day after his Inauguration (with women wearing pink pussy hats to chide Trump for his boasts about grabbing women in the crotch).

Trump also could have acknowledged that he lost the popular vote but note that he had won under the rules of the Constitution and intended to be President for all the people. Instead he put forth the absurd notion that he had won the popular vote, which he lost by almost three million ballots (and, no, there is no evidence of five million illegal votes for Clinton).

Phony Tough Guy

Over those crucial early days, Trump continued to tweet out silly comments, replete with bad spelling and sloppy grammar. His aides then had to defend his “alternative facts,” which played into the theme that Trump was a pathetic know-nothing who acted like a pompous know-it-all. All of that might have fit his image as a cad who cared nothing for what the powers-that-be thought about him, but it turned out that Trump was essentially a phony tough guy who could be brought to his knees if pounded sufficiently by the opinion leaders.

Under the daily barrage of Russia-gate headlines, Trump tossed aside his first national security adviser, retired Gen. Michael Flynn, (essentially for not remembering every detail of a phone conversation with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kisylak). Trump then had his foreign-policy team join in bashing Russia (to prove he wasn’t Putin’s “puppet,” as Hillary Clinton had called him).

Trump’s policies toward Ukraine and Crimea became indistinguishable from those of President Obama’s. Trump also showed no curiosity regarding how the Obama administration had stoked the Ukraine crisis and, in 2014, had facilitated the violent putsch that overthrew elected President Viktor Yanukovych and provoked Crimea’s secession from Ukraine and the Ukrainian civil war.

In early April, after weeks of ignominious retreat under media fire, Trump hoisted his white flag of capitulation. He pleased the neocons and the liberal hawks with a rush to judgment on a mysterious chemical incident in an Al Qaeda-controlled area of northern Syria. Quickly blaming the Syrian government, Trump ordered the firing of 59 Tomahawk missiles at a Syrian airbase on April 6. He also suggested that the Russians shared in the Syrian government’s guilt.

And, just like Obama, Trump hid whatever evidence he had from the American people, insisting that they accept his “high confidence” in his White House assessment. Under Trump, Americans were still being treated like the proverbial mushrooms except Trump’s crude declarations had replaced Obama’s smooth disingenuousness. Indeed, except for Trump’s Kardashian personality and his limited vocabulary, Trump’s foreign policy reflects more continuity with Obama – and with Hillary Clinton’s hawkishness – than any genuine differences.

If anything, Trump is now shifting U.S.A. foreign policy more into line with what the neocons demand that Obama did. With Trump’s goal to work more cooperatively with Russia smashed by Russia-gate, he is now cementing a foreign policy that is almost indistinguishable from what Trump’s vanquished Republican rivals, such as neocon Senators Marco Rubio of Florida, or Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, would have espoused. Or, for that matter, Hillary Clinton.

As The Wall Street Journal reported on Monday, “The Trump administration’s still-emerging foreign policy has come into sharper focus as Defense Secretary Jim Mattis continues a whistle-stop tour through the Middle East, quietly placing building blocks for resetting ties that had been strained under the Obama White House.

“Over the past week, Mr. Mattis visited leaders in Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Israel bearing the message that the Trump administration wants to realign with those nations and stressing that Washington and capitals in the region have shared interests, such as fighting terrorism. An animating feature of Mr. Mattis’s effort is to counter what he repeatedly has described as the malign influence of Iran.”

In other words, Trump is signaling that he is now in thrall to the influential Israeli-Saudi tandem and that means he will continue to deform U.S. foreign policy to meet Israeli-Saudi regional desires, which include a new bid for “regime change” in Syria and a heightened confrontation with Iran and Russia.

This strategy surrenders to the same falsehoods that brought George W. Bush’s presidency to disaster. It means the Saudis, the Qataris and other Sunni sheikdoms will again have a free hand to quietly slip U.S.-manufactured weaponry to Al Qaeda and its cohorts. It means the U.S.A. government will have to pile on evermore lies to conceal the sickening reality of a de facto U.S.A./Al Qaeda alliance from the American people.

The attendant tensions with Russia – and eventually with China – also could provoke a nuclear confrontation that Trump is psychologically unfit to manage. Playing madman – and counting on President Putin or President Xi to play the adult – is not as clever as it may sound. Putin and Xi have their own internal political pressures to consider – and they may feel compelled to call one of Trump’s bluffs.

Thus, Trump now appears on course to become a failed U.S.A. president, maybe one of the worst. But let’s all hope he is NOT the last.

Investigative reporter Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories for The Associated Press and Newsweek in the 1980s. You can buy his latest book, America’s Stolen Narrative, either in print here or as an e-b ook (from Amazon and barnesandnoble.com).

Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Comments

  • demerwater  On April 28, 2017 at 4:53 am

    And here I was, thinking that the POTUS is making headway up the steep learning slope on which his election has placed him.
    I was expecting to witness a ‘metamorphosis’ – the emergence of a new, improved President.
    Instead, I might be witnessing a brightening of the “true colors” of the character of Donald J. Trump – the ruthless businessman.
    Donald J. Trump reminds me of Oliver Jessel who scared the stuffing out of Bookers Sugar Estates, about 50 years ago. Jessel Securities would do a hostile takeover of a business and then sell off its assets.
    BSE Ltd. embarked upon a counter-strategy to increase its share value – a foil to the Jessel modus operandi. This was explained to us; and I “sell it as I bought it” – as my grandmother would express it.
    She might dismiss Donald J. Trump with “empty vessels make most sound”.

    • Rosaliene Bacchus  On April 28, 2017 at 1:07 pm

      I doubt that your grandmother would’ve dismissed the danger of DJT. He does indeed like making lots of noise. He loves playing with missiles and bombs. As to nuclear bombs, he’d also love to shoot those off. Why have them, if you can’t use them, he once commented.

  • Clyde Duncan  On April 28, 2017 at 8:57 pm

    “Indeed, what we have learned about Trump in the first 100 days is that he is a thin-skinned, insecure narcissist who obsesses over slights and relishes tangible signs of praise and approval. The Clinton campaign was right about one thing at least, that Trump’s fragile ego puts the future of mankind at risk given his control of the U.S.A. nuclear arsenal.”

    President Obama said as much during the campaign in 2016 ….
    Now, if the New York Times is to be believed, Donald Trump is no longer allowed to write his own tweets. Instead, said the Times report, his campaign makes him dictate them.

    “Apparently, his campaign has taken away his Twitter,” Obama said, speaking in Kissimmee, Florida. “In the last two days, they had so little confidence in his self-control, that they said, “We’re just going to take away your Twitter.”

    I feel sure this cannot be true, Obama added.

    I feel sure his campaign managers said to him: “Please, Mr. Trump. If you let us do your tweeting for you, we’ll buy you some more KFC.” There had to be some sort of deal here. Deals are Trump’s lifeblood.

    Still, the president drew a conclusion from all this: “Now, if somebody can’t handle a Twitter account, they can’t handle the nuclear codes.”

    He didn’t stop there.

    “If somebody starts tweeting at 3 in the morning because SNL made fun of you, then you can’t handle the nuclear codes,” said the president.

    This refers to Trump angrily tweeting that Saturday Night Live should be retired because it was boring. Donald Trump is a dangerous man-child.

  • Clyde Duncan  On April 29, 2017 at 12:07 pm

    100 days of Trump, and he’s not the only one who has learned a lot

    Hadley Freeman | The Guardian UK

    It’s highly unlikely you’ve started counting off his achievements, as is traditional at this point

    Happy landmark day to President Trump, who in the 100 days since he took office has set the political bar so low it is considered a triumph that he hasn’t started a nuclear war, yet.

    Your first reaction to that sentence was probably: “Bloody hell – has it only been 100 days?”

    Your second was even more probably: “Huh, I thought he started a nuclear war with North Korea on Twitter two weeks ago.”

    The point is, it’s highly unlikely that you started counting off his achievements, as is traditional at this point in a new presidency. Not so surprising, given that his most striking accomplishment so far is becoming the first USA president to entertain Sarah Palin, Kid Rock and Ted Nugent in the Oval Office at once, thus unifying the four horsemen of the apocalypse in one Instagrammable selfie.

    Trump has learned all sorts of things since becoming president – that healthcare is “complicated”, that the relationship of China and North Korea is “not so easy”, and that perhaps NATO isn’t “obsolete” after all. And it’s safe to say 2017 has been a learning experience for the rest of us, too. For me, it’s been one long (so very, very long) self-revelation. Here’s what I’ve learned so far.

    1. I had too much faith in Donald Trump
    When I was growing up in New York in the 80s, Trump was as much a figure of revulsion and fun in the press as, say, Jeremy Clarkson or Philip Green are today. Prime Minister Clarkson – that’s how weird it is that Trump’s now president (I might have once used Boris Johnson as my analogy here, but that scenario now lacks the requisite improbability factor).

    But despite this, I still overestimated him, and continue to do so. I feared his presidency, but I never thought he’d be this bad. Which is weird, because I remember the time he took out an advert in the tabloids to say five black and Hispanic teenagers should be given the death sentence after they were accused of raping a woman in Central Park, and I also remember, when the boys were later fully exonerated, that he still insisted he was right. And yet, every day I read the news and my head bangs down on the desk and I think, “I can’t believe this…” Who’d have thought I was such an optimist?

    2. I can’t stop reading about Jared Kushner
    As a kid, I met a lot of overly privileged bullies at my summer camp, and vowed I would never end up with one of them in my life. Now there’s such a man running the show for his father-in-law in the White House and I spend too much of my adult years obsessively reading about him in the news. This, I believe, is what is called “IRONY”.

    3. The media are still stumped by Trump
    I love journalism. Hell, I’ve been a so-called journalist for 17 years. But it has undoubtedly been straining at its own seams during this presidency. The problem is, there’s no impartial way to say that a rambling, incoherent, ignorant liar who only ran because he was all “boo-hoo-wah-wah” after President Obama and other cool kids made fun of him at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner in 2011 – and he is now president of the United States of America.

    Some news organisations still struggle to understand that words that sound judgmental can also be the objective truth.

    So we get phrases like “President Trump entertained dignitaries at Mar-a-Lago” instead of “President Trump forced some high-ranking politicians to come to his shoddy golf club and rambled at them incoherently”, or “President Trump made a strong and surprising announcement yesterday”, for which read, “President Trump tweeted something so deranged yesterday even your racist uncle thought he might have gone a bit far.”

    4. I am fiercely patriotic
    “The problem with the left is it sneers at those who take pride in their country! It doesn’t celebrate patriotism!” This has been the cry of the American right for the past few years (when what they really mean is it doesn’t celebrate nativism).

    Well, allow me to direct all of our collective gaze to the liberal protests this year defending modern American values and rallying (implicitly or overtly) against Trump, including last weekend’s March for Science. Hearteningly, this resistance movement, instead of fading from exhaustion, seems to be only stronger now the shock of the election has passed. Thus another cliché is disproved, that our attention spans have been corroded by Snapchat.

    I felt the patriotic surge to a degree that surprised even me. It was only when Trump was elected that I got my act together and sorted out my sons’ citizenship applications.

    True, the last thing America might need right now is more white men, but I will not give up the field. I will not leave the country to become some desolate wasteland, every tax dollar bilked away into the Trump and Kushner bank accounts. To the barricades, boys!

  • Gigi  On April 29, 2017 at 1:51 pm

    Mr Parry, I get your anguish at having Trump represent the American people on the world stage. I feel the same about my birthing country– I cannot bear to call it my mother country unless I was born to a mother who spitted me out and walked away, not giving a frig about what became me and the life I had to carve out on my own amidst the horrors and cruelties of a hateful, degenerate and unkind society.

    But Trump’s character is spot on and is a true reflection of America. I am glad that it is on view for the whole wide world to see. World leaders have long been exposed to America and Israel’s vindictiveness and total indifference to human suffering inflicted by these countries through their close alliances –depraved minds think alike. While the world have cause to be wary and afraid of the destruction these two countries will wreak by their actions, those wise and responsible leaders among us know that they have to be prepared to act decisively because they cannot allow the world to be held hostage and suffer even greater harm as a result. Many of the atrocities that occurred in history could have been avoided if wise people had acted responsibly. America is the only country to use nuclear bombs against other countries. The world has not forgotten! There is no question that America will do so again so the threat isn’t that chilling. Knowing what a person is capable of is less scary than not knowing. We know…

  • Clyde Duncan  On April 29, 2017 at 4:04 pm

    A Reality Check on NAFTA for Donald Trump

    Gordon Ritchie – The Globe and Mail – Toronto

    Gordon Ritchie is a former Canadian ambassador for trade negotiations and deputy chief negotiator of the Canada-U.S.A. free-trade agreement (FTA)

    In the last week, U.S.A. President Donald Trump has turned his fire on his northern neighbours, proclaiming that the North American free-trade agreement was the worst trade deal in history and Canadians have used it to treat Americans roughly and even disgracefully, taking advantage of weak American leaders to run up a huge surplus in our trade.

    These intemperate comments caused some consternation in Canada, but it is worth doing a reality check on these bold assertions, drawing on the Trump administration’s own data, principally from the website of the Office of the United States Trade Representative, which will ultimately lead any negotiations with Canada and Mexico.

    There we read that on two-way trade of $662.7-billion (all figures U.S.A.) in 2015, the latest data posted, “[t]he U.S.A. goods and services trade surplus with Canada was $11.9-billion.”

    That’s right: The Americans sell more to us than we sell to them under NAFTA.

    They sell us more services (a surplus of $27-billion) and we sell them more goods (a surplus of $15-billion) but before anyone gets too excited, these balances represent only a few days’ trade in either direction.

    If we look at trade in goods alone, the USTR points out that “Canada was the United States’ largest goods export market in 2015.” Not only the largest but the highest-value products – cars and trucks, machinery, etc. A much bigger and better market than China or Mexico.

    As for U.S.A. imports from Canada, a sizable chunk (more than $100-billion by the most recent figures) comes in the form of energy.

    In the original free-trade negotiations in the 1980s, it was a prime U.S.A. objective to get assured access to Canadian energy after the problems with the National Energy Program that restricted and taxed energy shipments to the United States.

    Mission accomplished. Canada is by far the biggest and most secure supplier of the American appetite for oil, gas, and electricity, at very favourable prices.

    Take that out of the equation, and the United States of America runs a substantial SURPLUS on its trade in all other goods with Canada.

    That’s right: Setting aside energy, the United States sells us much more than we sell to them under NAFTA. And much of this trade, in both directions, is within large, American-owned companies.

    The classic case is the auto companies, General Motors and Ford. It is estimated that the typical auto part crosses a NAFTA border seven times before emerging in the finished automobile.

    These companies are not amused by Mr. Trump’s threat to terminate the agreement. As Prime Minister Justin Trudeau pointed out to the President, such a rash move would cause massive disruption to American as well as Canadian firms and workers dependent on NAFTA supply chains.

    How many jobs are at stake? The United States Chamber of Commerce estimates that nearly 14 million American jobs depend on NAFTA.

    This – not sweet talk over the phone – is the real reason Mr. Trump has backed down from his threat to withdraw, at least for the moment. American companies, American workers and American politicians (such as Senator John McCain) pushed back hard.

    There will always be room for marginal improvement around the edges of any trade arrangement but the central fact remains: The Canada-U.S.A. trade relationship is the envy of the world.

    Perhaps Mr. Trump believes he can “roll” the unfailingly polite young Canadian Prime Minister as he claims to have rolled his opponents in so many real estate deals. That would be a serious misjudgment.

    It is worth remembering that Mr. Trudeau boxes for recreation and that hockey is our national game.

  • Clyde Duncan  On April 30, 2017 at 12:08 am

    Prime Minister of Canada, Justin Trudeau, Boxing ….

  • twoifbycharm  On May 2, 2017 at 10:58 pm

    Thank you for this well-written and thoughtful piece. Back in August, I wrote and posted a report on Trump, and the topic of sociopathy. I decided to write after having experienced a sociopath, and learning quite a bit on the topic. That education lead me to immediately suspect that Trump is one, consistent with the proposition of many professionals. I hope you and your readers take some time to look through it. Thank you. B. Ashley
    https://twoifbycharmwordpress.wordpress.com/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: