Why do North Indians Look Different from South Indians? The Genetics of South Asia
Masaman – Published on May 21, 2017
Today, we’re going to answer the questions of why North and South Indians have such vastly varying features, and look at the genetic history of South Asia as a whole. I’m not trying to offend anyone with my tangent on skin color discrimination in Bollywood and Indian society.
I am merely stating a fact that Bollywood actors are of a much lighter complexion than the average Indian so it’s not fair to judge what the average Indian looks like by looking at South Indian celebrities.
Indians with light skin are not any less “Indian-looking” than Indians with dark skin. Don’t post racist comments in my comment section. Thanks. Masaman
Comments
In the pic provided they smile in the North but not in the South?
Reminds me a lot of tooothpaste and other commercials.
I will deal with major fallacies in the video a little later.
Veda Nath Mohabir.
Masaman claims he used “genetics” but nowhere does he cite a single study/result. He is simply regurgitating fictional conventional wisdom (which unfortunately populates all current text books because virtually all so-called experts who wrote the textbooks and the Judeo-Christian cabal who run the universities and publishing houses cannot allow the truth to be published – that INDIA is the platform for most non-African people on the Globe and is the earliest, extant civilization, hence deemed the “Cradle” by non-partisan scholars such as Louis Jacolliot).
1. Fallacies of Proto-Indo-European (PEI) language
Dr Kazanas findings (discussed in two books) that on exploring anthropological, archaeological, genetic, linguistic and literary evidence that the Indo-European languages germinated in “Sapta-Sindhu” = ‘Land of Seven Rivers’ in North-west India and (since 1947) Pakistan and Bactria, and then went on to spread (Sanskrit) to both the East and the West which then ‘ radiated North, North-west and West to all countries of Asia and Europe. See #7 in
http://indiafacts.org/fallacies-proto-indo-european/
2. Kazanas rips apart the ‘Arya Invasion Theory’of India (AIT).
Europeans came up with “two fictional” theories: firstly, that Egyptians or Sumerians invaded India and installed the Caste system (of course Europe had to have casteism for them to recognize it in India). Caste is derived from ‘casta’ in Portuguese and ‘castus’ in Latin. Portuguese introduced the word in India.
Then, the linguists, chief among them, Max Muller, a German Christian scholar, was co-opted by the British East India Co. to study Sanskrit in India, as a way to understand Indian culture in order to control Indians to rip-off their riches which was used to generate the Industrial Revolution. Muller introduced the chronology of a fictional Aryan invasion 1500-1200BCE based on Bishop Usher’s pronouncement that Creation of the universe occurred in 4004BCE. So, nothing could be before that Biblical date.
Dr. Kazanas admits that for 18 years he, himself, taught these fictional AIT theories until he began to look at the filmsy and no-basis assertions and weak logic.
Only a week ago, I came across Dr. Kazanas views, to add to the plethora of experts who have scholarly debunked these false theories pushed by Eurocentric and Christian missionaries since the 18-19th century to defeat Indian pride in their Hindu heritage. Louis Jacolliot a French jurist (150 years ago) in India – author of “Bible in India” – is especially harsh on the Jesuits. See here where I refer to the book. https://guyaneseonline.wordpress.com/2017/08/19/book-review-mahathis-hare-krishna-by-leonard-dabydeen/#comment-196290
3. Michael Danino on Archaeology Online cites several genomic studies which destroy the AIT fiction, but furthermore shows that the reverse is the case –
INDIA BECAME THE PLATFORM FOR MOST NON-AFRICANS AROUND THE WORLD!
“The overall picture emerging from these studies is, first, an unequivocal rejection of a 3500-BP arrival of a “Caucasoid” or Central Asian gene pool. Just as the imaginary Aryan invasion / migration left no trace in Indian literature, in the archaeological and the anthropological record, it is invisible at the genetic level. The agreement between these different fields is remarkable by any standard, and offers hope for a grand synthesis in the near future, which will also integrate agriculture and linguistics.
“Secondly, they account for India’s considerable genetic diversity by using a time- scale not of a few millennia, but of 40,000 or 50,000 years. In fact, several experts, such as Lluís Quintana-Murci,20 Vincent Macaulay,21 Stephen Oppenheimer,22 Michael Petraglia,23 and their associates, have in the last few years proposed that when Homo sapiens migrated out of Africa, he first reached South-West Asia around 75,000 BP, and from here, went on to other parts of the world. In simple terms, except for Africans, all humans have ancestors in the North-West of the Indian peninsula. In particular, one migration started around 50,000 BP towards the Middle East and Western Europe:
INDEED, NEARLY ALL EUROPEANS — AND BY EXTENSION, MANY AMERICANS — CAN TRACE THEIR ANCESTORS TO ONLY FOUR MTDNA LINES, WHICH APPEARED BETWEEN 10,000 AND 50,000 YEARS AGO AND ORIGINATED FROM SOUTH ASIA.”
Danino continues:
WE WILL NOT CALL IT, OF COURSE, AN “INDIAN INVASION” OF EUROPE; IN SIMPLE TERMS, INDIA ACTED “AS AN INCUBATOR OF EARLY GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION OF MODERN HUMANS MOVING OUT OF AFRICA.”
http://archaeologyonline.net/artifacts/genetics-aryan-debate
Veda Nath Mohabir
I saw this video a few weeks back when I was watching a Youtube video on Guyana with Dr Dhanpaul Narine and other scholars discussing Guyana. This video popped up as one of those ‘recommended for you’ under google’s snooping eyes. Anyway, I had mentioned before that my son did the dna trace via discovery magazine and found out that my mother’s roots traced to the Kashmir region. My mother’s family was Brahman, but I would like to suspect that they were actually Buddhist fleeing religious conflict in Kashmir during the period where they ended up in Guyana.
According to my readings on India and the caste system, Africans were, at one time, hired to fight in the Indian military, and part of their payment/reward included women – most likely those from the lower caste. I read that the Dalit/Untouchables caste was subsequently created to place this coupling and their resultant offspring. In Indian society, Dalits are considered to be of a lower caste than full Africans. Food for thought.
Thinker: I will let Gigi defend herself. My approach is to deal with controversial assertions with facts. I could easily have dismissed Masaman’s thesis and video on North/South Indians as mostly junk – not supported by genetics even though he claims it. But, I chose to spend lots of valuable time assembling scientific/scholarly evidence to dispute his views. My aim is to let readers learn the facts so they in turn can trash the spurious ‘conventional wisdom’. Similarly, I have dealt with Black racists here such as “Tata” by providing factual evidence. I want to see Gigi’s evidence before jumping to conclusion.
I, myself, have seen an account about the origin of Siddhis, where an Indian Nawab went to Africa and brought back an African wife and a small African army. So this is why I prefer to see her evidence before jumping to conclusions.
When it comes to India, one can easily be led astray by the numerous theories floating around and even embedded in textbooks at all levels of scholarship, as I mentioned above. The most pernicious ones: the Aryan Invasion Theory (AIT) and the linked caste system. If the AIT falls, the origins of the caste system will fall. So too, much of what is understood as the origins of Judeo-Christian-Islamic religions and the attendant Western Civilization will collapse. While not dealing with AIT, Louis Jacolliot’s The Bible in India clearly states that India’s Vedic Philosophy and religion – Hinduism – and Sanskrit are the bases for them – that India is the “cradle” of them. Add to that the findings in DNA research (which demolishes AIT) and the stage is set for the upheaval. There is another 1852 (yes 1852) book by an English scholar which also points to India as the ‘cradle’. I will reveal that book in time. Neither these two path-breaking books could be found in bookstore and libraries because of the revolutionary theories. They are nevertheless online. I gave the link (see above) to a recent Indian edition of Jacolliot’s book (at Amazon.com) in the link I provided about Leonard Dabydeen’s book review on Krishna (Jacolliot spells it as Christna for its obvious link to Christ).
Even the Dalit spokesman, Ambedkar, and Guyanese historian, Clem Seecharan, have bought into the AIT, – ‘line, hook and sinker’ which has NO factual basis, as discussed above. There has been call for Seecharan’s ‘revisionist’ poorly researched ideas to get into Caribbean, et al, textbooks. I will deal with Seecharan in an upcoming book (getting delayed so it will be early next year). He used the AIT and caste system to denounce Hindu indentured labourers – for racism on African-Guyanese (not unlike Kean Gibson) . In a similar vein, Freddie Kissoon, the (Indian-Hindu hater because he myopically sees them as too agrestic in thinking) denounced the Indian Arrival Cmmttee in Guyana to ‘have gone to India’ (meaning too immersed in India as a bad influence) so they couldn’t see the PPP gov’t bias against African staff in the civil service. Maybe his facts are correct. What I object to is the derogatory ‘having gone to India’, while his supporters on this site yell: ‘yeah, yeah’.
Veda Nath Mohabir.
ORIGIN OF UNTOUCHABLILITY
Gigi: I have never heard of the African mercenaries’ involvement in the caste system. The only known (by me) of Africans in India are the Siddhis community (originally brought as slaves by the Arabs, Portuguese British). Gigi: Pl state your source material, I’d like to become more informed on this.
Dr Ambedkar, the most prominent Dalit, who ironically was architect of the Indian constitution, (I am working from memory here so am not 100% factual) argued that untouchability was derived from conflict by Hindus and Buddhists over beef-eating. He stated that Hindus stopped eating beef and then made the Buddhists, who were still bee-eaters, ‘outsiders’. So, any function, eg. killing, tanning hides etc.) related to the cow became unacceptable and ‘Untouchable’.
Also, India is not the only country with Untouchability. Read this about Japan:
Click to access History%20of%20Untouchables.pdf
ALL INDIANS FROM TWO FOUNDER GROUPS – NORTH AND SOUTH
Unlike what Masaman says, the “largest DNA survey” show that all Indians are a combination of two tens-of-thousands old ‘founder’ groups:
“The population of India was founded on two ancient groups that are as genetically distinct from each other as they are from other Asians, according to the largest DNA survey of Indian heritage to date. Nowadays, however, most Indians are a genetic hotchpotch of both ancestries, despite the populous nation’s highly stratified social structure.
“All Indians are pretty similar,” says Chris Tyler-Smith, a genome researcher at the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute near Cambridge, UK, who was not involved in the study. “The population subdivision has not had a dominating effect.”
On the subject of caste (really Jati = family-oriented occupation) what the British did was ‘setting it in stone’ rather than the fluid system that obtains earlier.
http://www.nature.com/news/2009/090922/full/news.2009.935.html
Two examples to support that India is platform for all non-Africans.
I always suspected I had Chinese in my mother’s family (even though I am typically brown likely from my father) so I did a Genographic DNA test. The result: My mtDNA (M* from mother) map show that my genes go through North India all the way through Southeast Asia to Australia (look at aborigines there) with other branches going North (Kashmir and beyond), North-East (China and beyond) likely to Americas and West into West Asia and Europe. This is my own DNA confirmation that India is platform for most non-African people on the globe.
I also saw a Chinese young woman’s DNA result. Very surprisingly (until I saw many geneticists’ surveys) HER MAP GOES THRU SOUTH INDIA and then up, heading to the Far east!
Veda Nath Mohabir
Please be frank and note that Gigi’s explanation for the presence of Dalits, as opposed to Sidis is unfounded and anachronistic. There should be no hesitation in calling out Gigi’s anti-black racism. Don’t pretend that someone of your learning would take Gigi’s allegations seriously.
Wow thinker, show your PROOF if my explanation is unfounded rather that spew your typical hot air and expect others to simply believe and accept it just because YOU said it. Narcissistic much pea brain????
Veda Nath Mohabir, I suspect that you are very much aware of the history but you want the proof in exposure. Okay, I’ll bite…I compile my sources and post it.
Thinker: I will let Gigi defend herself. My approach is to deal with controversial assertions with facts. I could easily have dismissed Masaman’s thesis and video on North/South Indians as mostly junk – not supported by genetics even though he claims it. But, I chose to spend lots of valuable time assembling scientific/scholarly evidence to dispute his views. My aim is to let readers learn the facts so they in turn can trash the spurious ‘conventional wisdom’. Similarly, I have dealt with Black racists here such as “Tata” by providing factual evidence. I want to see her evidence before jumping to conclusion.
I, myself, have seen an account about the origin of Siddhis, where an Indian Nawab went Africa and brought back an African wife and small African army. So this is why I prefer to see her evidence before jumping to conclusions.
When it comes to India, one can easily be led astray by the numerous theories floating around and even embedded in textbooks at all levels of scholarship, as I mentioned above. The most pernicious ones: the Aryan Invasion Theory (AIT) and the linked caste system. If the AIT falls, the origins of the caste system will fall. So too, much of what is understood as the origins of Judeo-Christian-Islamic religions and the attendant Western Civilization will collapse. While not dealing with AIT, Louis Jacolliot’s The Bible in India clearly states that India’s Vedic Philosophy and religion – Hinduism – and Sanskrit are the bases for them – that India is the “cradle” of them. Add to that the findings in DNA research (which demolishes AIT) and the stage is set for the upheaval. There is another 1852 (yes 1852) book by an English scholar which also points to India as the ‘cradle’. I will reveal that book in time. Neither these two path-breaking books could be found in bookstore and libraries because of the revolutionary theories. They are nevertheless online. I gave the link (see above) to a recent edition of Jacolliot’s book (at Amazon.com) in the link I provided about Leonard Dabydeen’s book review on Krishna (Jacolliot spells it as Christna for its obvious link to Christ).
Even the Dalit spokesman, Ambedkar, and Guyanese historian, Clem Seecharan, have bought into the AIT, – ‘line, hook and sinker’ which has NO factual basis, as discussed above. There has been call for Seecharan’s ‘revisionist’ poorly researched ideas to get into Caribbean, et al, textbooks. I will deal with Seecharan in an upcoming book (getting delayed so it will be early next year). He used the AIT and caste system to denounce Hindu indentured labourers – for racism on African-Guyanese (not unlike Kean Gibson) . In a similar vein, Freddie Kissoon, the (Indian-Hindu hater because myopically sees them as too agrestic in thinking) denounced the Indian Arrival Cmmttee in Guyana to ‘have gone to India’ (meaning too immersed in India as a bad influence) so they couldn’t see the PPP gov’t bias against African staff in the civil service. Maybe his facts are correct. What I object to is the derogatory ‘having gone to India’, while his supporters on this site yell ‘yeah, yeah’.
Veda Nath Mohabir.
@ Veda Nath Mohabir, as promised..whew! the writings are extensive. Some may overlay either to show a consistency in narrative, variation of different ethnic/racial sources, or simple sloppiness on my part. I usually don’t have the time to do all this digging but (1) your stellar intelligence and level of discourse has piqued my interest, and (2) I recently sprained my ankle puttering about in my yard and am holed up on the couch with my computer and tv for diversion (not a pleasant activity). This compilation is but a smattering of what is out there. Of course, you don’t need me to tell you that history is mostly cherry picking on the part of the writer and that it’s best to take the black and the white of it and use that to arrive at the the grey areas/rational conclusions.
A Complex World: History, Religion, Caste and Race in India. […] the Sudras themselves, identified with the color black. Beneath even the Sudras were the outcastes or untouchables, composed of the unfortunate offspring of Brahmin-Sudra unions and long-established Black populations in India, […] http://atlantablackstar.com/2014/12/14/a-complex-world-history-religion-caste-and-race-in-india/
The Sudroid (Indo-African) Race: The Sudran, or Sudroid, race refers to the aboriginal populations of India. Sudroid includes the following peoples: Dravidoids (speakers of Dravidian languages), Untouchables or Avarans, Antyajas/Dalits/SC , Adivasis/ST, Vedic Shudrs (Aryanized and enslaved blacks). http://www.raceandhistory.com/historicalviews/Sudroid.htm
Dalits and the Origin of Untouchability in India: Origin of Untouchability. Why the Aryans developed a social organization wherein the Chandalas occupied the lowest position is answered by the “mixed caste” theory offered by Manu. This theory explains the existence of the four Varnas as divinely-ordained and the other castes outside the Varna scheme as a result of unlawful sexual alliances between men and women of dif¬ferent Varnas. The Chandala resulted as the offspring of a Brahman woman and a Shudra man. Four other groups were also included among the “untouchables”. In the years after 200 AD, “untouchability” came to include more groups. http://www.yourarticlelibrary.com/sociology/dalits-and-the-origin-of-untouchability-in-india-origin-of-untouchability/32966/
DALITS_IN_INDIA_IN_HISTORICAL_PERSPECTIVE_OF_CASTE_SYSTEM
The Siddis: Africans of India. Most Siddis are Bantu descendants from southeast Africa. In the 13th and 14th centuries, most slaves were mainly drawn from countries in the Nile region: lower Egypt, Ethiopia, Somalia, and Sudan. Due to their fighting prowess, many became soldiers in the armies of conquerors and sultans all over India’s princely states. http://www.academia.edu/5450831
DALIT: THE BLACK UNTOUCHABLES OF INDIA: Possibly the most substantial percentage of Asia’s Blacks can be identified among India’s 160 million “Untouchables” or “Dalits.” Frequently they are called “Outcastes.”
Africans in India: From Slaves to Sultans. […] The African men and women who were taken to India through the early years of the slave trade were known as Habshi (Abyssinian) and Siddi. They came mostly from Ethiopia, Eritrea, Somalia, and adjoining areas. As Diouf explains, “Muslim, Ethiopian Christian, and Indian traders preyed on people they all considered ‘pagans.’ Trained as soldiers, they were highly prized for their military skills. It is among these men that the generals, commanders, and rulers emerged.” […]The military was often the entrée to power and riches, and the Africans were regarded as great warriors who fought in armies all over India. Slave soldiers, guards, and bodyguards were routinely freed after a few years of service, often married local women, and were integrated into the larger society. http://www.khabar.com/magazine/cover-story/africans-in-india-from-slaves-to-sultans
Gigi: You have provided lots of info..Great work. I just scanned them and won’t have time until Monday to look closer Hope Thinker is satisfied.
One reservation I have is with Runoko Rashidi (in the first link) I have had cause to challenge his views in a letter, over a dozen years ago, to Pride magazine in Toronto, catering mainly to the African population. He was in Toronto on a lecture tour promoting the said stuff in the first link. For example, he claimed Buddha was black. (and East Asians depict him as East Asian and they are shocked when they are told he was Indian). For him anyone with very dark skin is “Black”.
Importantly, it is hardly known that Islamic invaders took power in most of India for close to 800 years until the British upended them for another 200 years (all at expense of Hindus). According to a reliable estimate, the Hindu population was decimated – by a decline of 80 million just in 500 years under the Bahami Sultans, not counting what the Mughals did. So, much of glory given to the Muslim rulers, including the Africans who were taken to India by the Muslim rulers, would be tainted by that fact. Hindus were butchered. Read American historian, Will Durant, on this. He called the butchery the ‘bloddiest story in history’. Others have called the decimation the greatest “genocide” the world has known..
Few other statements got my attention: “The Ethiopians are colonists sent from India, who follow their forefathers in matters of wisdom.” The literary work of the early Christian writer Eusebius preserves the tradition that, “In the reign of Amenophis III [the mighty Dynasty XVIII Ancient Egyptian king] a body of Ethiopians migrated from the country about the Indus, and settled in the valley of the Nile.”
And, “But of all (the kings of Ethiopia) Ganges was most famous, who with his Ethiopian army passed into Asia and conquered all as far as the River Ganges to which he left that name, being before called Chliaros.”
I have always noticed how much Ethiopians and other East Aficans look like Indian mixtures. In the case of the Nile: it is from Sanskrit Neel or Nil = Blue. So, no wonder it is spoken of as “Blue” Nile! In fact we are saying: Blue Blue! It got its Sanskrit name from India..I told Tata, the African racist who prowls this site looking for Indians to attack, this very fact a few months ago. Now about Ganges, here is what Wiktionary tells us about the etymology: From Ancient Greek Γάγγης (Gángēs), from Sanskrit गङ्गा (gáṅgā, literally “swift-goer”), from verbal root √gam (√gam, “to go”). https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Ganges
So, Runonko Rashidi is wrong again!
Veda NM.
Quoting Runoko Rashidi on Dalits is not a serious enterprise. Not to be snobbish, but even though he is a darling of the Afrocentric circuit, the only qualification mentioned about him is an honorary degree in theology. We are not talking about someone doing original research. Let us state categorically that AIT has been disproven outright, particularly by genetic studies. But this is relatively recently so we can forgive Dr Ambedkar for not knowing this. But not Clem Seecharan and others of more recent vintage.
What is known is that Blacks were the original inhabitants of Asia. The inhabitants of the Andaman islands are only one of the indicators.The Buddha’s hair is depicted as African probably because it suggested ancient origin, nothing to do with what he actually looked http://brigidkeely.tumblr.com/post/83828259813/the-buddhas-woolly-hair As you have pointed out there is no genetic divide among the people of India and every non-African has forebears from India. All that is known. What ever the origins of caste are Ambedkar was incorrect if he put it down to Buddhists being unwilling to give up meat. Ambedkar was simply a man of his time without the knowledge which is available to us today. More on Ambedkar http://www.ijrhss.org/pdf/v3-i3/1.pdf
As far as Ethiopians and other East Africans are concerned there is now ample historical evidence to suggest that in early times there was remigration into Africa from the Middle East. http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-34479905
More later
Etymology is potentially a very deceptive enterprise. Word borrowing occurs but it often revolves around essential aspects of culture. When you mention the “blue Nile” idea, the first thing that comes to mind is that the Nile starts in Uganda flowing north where it encounters the so-called “blue Nile” which originates in the Ethiopian Highlands and flows west and north-west. The silt turns the river dark brown, not really blue. The Amharic word for blue bears no resemblance to anything Indo-European. However, the crucial thing to remember is that the languages of North and East Africa as well as those of the Middle East belong to the Afro-asiatic family of languages (from Nigeria to Iraq). Because the branches of this group (Chadic, Berber, Cushitic, Ancient Egyptian, Omotic, Semitic) are mainly to be found in Africa, it is evident that proto language originated in Africa. Any movement of Eastern people back into Africa as pointed out in my reply, would not have involved any noticeable Indo-European influence. People have difficulty understanding this because they wrongly imagine that mythical “Adam” was born in the M.E and that his sons spread out in all directions. So most Arabs can’t imagine that their “sacred: language has African roots.
Veda Nath Mohabir On September 6, 2017 at 12:42 am
This article br Dr.Venkateswarlu Yesapoguso poorly written, with a lot of ambiguities and contradictions. so even though I had compiled some counter arguments, I will not post them as they are too lengthy.
Also, this will be my last post on these issues.
Re. the Ganges. For Indians, especially Hindus and Buddhists, the Ganges (properly Ganga) is considered the greatest goddess descended to earth. So, to say that some relatively recent soldier of fortune gave his name to the Ganges is huge slap on Hindus/India. There are many ancient legends surrounding her divinity. To get a sense of her importance, and India’s impact on the world, have a look at Wikipedia, including what Henry David Thoreau and Voltaire had to say.
• In the morning I bathe my intellect in the stupendous and cosmogonal philosophy of the Bhagavad Gita, since whose composition years of the gods have elapsed, and in comparison with which our modern world and its literature seem puny and trivial; and I doubt if that philosophy is not to be referred to a previous state of existence, so remote is its sublimity from our conceptions. I lay down the book and go to my well for water, and lo! there I meet the servant of the Brahmin, priest of Brahma, and Vishnu and Indra, who still sits in his temple on the River Ganga reading the Vedas, or dwells at the root of a tree with his crust and water jug. I meet his servant come to draw water for his master, and our buckets as it were grate together in the same well. The pure Walden water is mingled with the sacred water of the Ganga (Ganges).
o Henry David Thoreau, in Hindu Spirituality – What other say about it ( 24 July 2012)
• I am convinced that everything has come down to us from the banks of the Ganga – astronomy, astrology, spiritualism, etc. It is very important to note that some 2500 years ago at the least Pythagoras went from Samos to the Ganga to learn geometry.
o Francis M. Voltaire, in What is India? (5 May 2014)
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Ganges_in_Hinduism
You mention mythical Adam/Eve from the ME. Well, here is another surprise. Louis Jacolliot (a mulatto) the French jurist in India wrote in 1868: THE BIBLE IN INDIA – Indian Origin of Hebrew and Christian Revelations that the Adam/Eve myth is also from India/Sri Lanka. In fact, Adam is derived from Adima (= original, first man in Sanskrit) and Eve is from Heva (= to complete viz., as a couple). There is a major twist in the Indian account. The woman is NOT the source of original sin. In fact, in the Adima/Heva account, there NO original sin which all subsequent people have to atone for. They simply fell on hard times (had to toil for the needs) for not following God’s instruction. And, it was the man, Adima, who was blamed. Heva was hesitant and tried to persuade him not contravene the instruction (not to leave the idyllic Lanka). For that, she was rewarded – one of her female children would give birth to a Redeemer, parthenogenetically (such Krisna/Christna). See the link to Christ?
That Nile is also from Sanskrit, as I mentioned, is from another BOMBSHELL book written by Edward Pococke in 1851: INDIA IN GREECE (Indian Origin of Greece and the Ancient World). Pococke showed how the names of Indian people and places were transferred to Greece and other places where they emigrated.
Then, in another bombshell book, Guyanese Premsukh Poonai, MD., PhD, plant Geneticist, Botanist and Chemist wrote in 1994 the ORIGIN OF CIVILIZATION AND LANGUAGE. He too shows how the names of people and places in West Asia, Egypt, Phonecia, Greece, Italy, etc. are of Indian origin. All three use Sanskrit origination of names and places to prove their case.
Veda Nath Mohabir
My parents are both indian guyanese but I don’t look guyanese as I have now learned that my mother ancestors came from Iran. Also found out that my father ancestors were buck.
My aunt who is embarrassed with being associated with buck people changes the subject every time I mention it